Wide angle: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 13:01, 22 December 2021

How much does your lens see

Wide angles lenses have a focal length less than 28mm (20mm in APS-C) and a very wide field of view. While you see a lot, it is not easy to make use of them

Not what I thought it would be

I like taking landscape pictures. My first lens was the kit lens Nikon 18-105, and I really liked the wide end of it (18mm, 27mm in full frame) for that. I thought if I had a wider lens, I could make better pictures. Then when I finally had a really wide lens (Nikon 10-24), I realized, this does not really work like I thought it would.

It is true that you get more in the view, but it also pushes everything in front of you away, creating a big space between what you want to photograph and you. See the following picture

Sometimes that can be a good thing, you may want to show how far something stretched. I like the following shot from Ladakh, India, but then again, this is Ladakh, all pictures are great no matter what you do there.

You need to come close

If you think you are close, come closer and then a bit more.

You need consistent light

There will be distortion

For long lenses, the problem is to hold the lens steady and you fight with exposure time. For wide angle, the issue is to hold the camera straight. The wider you get the more things go crazy. What you need to learn is to keep the interest away from things that are no longer that straight. See the picture below

This is a relatively close shot of the wall, and I believe for the most part it works well. However, look closely on the edge of the frames you see how much skew there is. I highlighted some with cyan lines.

Examples

Have something in the foreground

The problem of the wide angle is that it pushes things away, so you need things to fill the foreground. This is a good example. All of a sudden it is not endless lake, the stones on the left fill the space. Their irregular shape also hides away how much distortion you have on the side of the frame.

Elevation helps

This shot is again from Ladakh, and it is helped by the greatness of the scenery. However, what also helps is that I can keep the camera straight, as I am about 100-150 meters above where the rivers join. Notice how nicely the flags again fill the space.

Interior with distance

I wish the scaffolding was not there, but still it gives a bit of perspective of how high the ceiling is in the Hagia Sophia (55m). This is one of those shots where the wide angle works quite good. However, it is important to keep everything aligned. If you are not centered correctly things go very wonky very fast.

Some tips

Come close, really close.
Keep your camera straight and level. Especially for scenery things work best, if the camera points straight to the horizon. Problem are shots of city where you are at the ground level. Ideally you want to be in the middle of the frame, so balconies are your friend.
Keep your subjects in the center (vertically or horizontally) as much as possible.
The outside of your frame will get more distorted, try to keep the disturbing lines away in those
Circular, round shapes do not distort so much. If your object is round (like the cook I use in example shots) latch on to that.

Gallery

Now at 10mm, but this time much closer, see File:cook_close_setup.jpg to see how close I am for this picture
This is how close I was for File:cook_close.jpg
Scenery from Ladakh, India
Scenery from Atacama, Chile. Using a very small aperture (f/29 to increase the depth of field
A view of Bosphorus, Istanbul Turkey. This is actually not a good shot. All the interesting part of the image is condensed in the middle of the picture. See Media:Wide.jpg for a cropped version at the title of the Wide angle page. This is a classical, "I thought wide angle would help me with getting more into my picture" problem.
The Hagia Sophia in Istanbul Turkey. One shot where you really love to have such a wide angle lens. Note that if you do not hold it straight all sorts of lines will be going crazy in the picture.
The Hagia Sophia in Istanbul Turkey, this time in a shot that is really bad. Yes you get everything in one shot, but everyhting feels wrong about this picture (it is embarrassing to show it here actually). It is not natural, things that are straight are visibly skewed, and it disturbs a lot. It is a good example of what you end up with most of the time if you do not have much experience with a very wide angle.
Wide angle lenses actually work much better when you are close. They are good for interior shots, where you do not have the space to be able to capture such a scene with a longer lens.
Just to demonstrate that a 20mm is actually a pretty good lens to get people. The only problem is that you have to be very close, and keep your subject centered.
Waterfall near Davos, Switzerland, a long exposure shot at 1/8s.
The British Museum, London. This works partially because I was able to hold the camera straight while taking the picture from the second floor.
This is at 16mm it is tricky to get such shots properly. Hold the camera straight, and make sure that you have the main motif centered.
Another shot at 16mm. Notice that there are no people in the shot, and the statue is centered reducing the distorted view as much as possible
Many people think that wide angle lenses are for taking pictures of wide open spaces. Most of the time, you need to come close. For this 16mm shot I almost shoved the camera into the reeds. I was going for a bit darker muted color, so that part is actually intentional.
Another 16mm shot. Such extreme wide angle will distort the picture quite a lot. There are a couple of things that allow me to sort of get away with some of the problems. There are a lot of curved surfaces (the thrash cans, the coast like, the roof), and I keep the structure in the center. With people all over the coast, this shot would not have worked as well.

These pages are for Amateur Photographers and not really for seasoned photographers and professionals. I have no affiliation or commercial interest with any brand/make. I write from my own experience. I ended up using mainly Nikon, so I am more familiar with this brand than others. See price for notes on pricing as well as photography related links.

@@ Line 91: / Line 91: @@
 File:waterfall_davos_8.jpg|Waterfall near Davos, Switzerland, a [[long exposure shot]] at <kbd>1/8s</kbd>.
 File:Poster_picture.jpg|The British Museum, London. This works partially because I was able to hold the camera straight while taking the picture from the second floor.
+File:nikon16-35_landing.jpg|This is at <kbd>16mm</kbd> it is tricky to get such shots properly. Hold the camera straight, and make sure that you have the main motif centered.
+File:nikon16-35_widestatue.jpg|Another shot at <kbd>16mm</kbd>. Notice that there are no people in the shot, and the statue is centered reducing the distorted view as much as possible
+File:nikon16-35_wide_wheat.jpg|Many people think that [[wide angle]] lenses are for taking pictures of wide open spaces. Most of the time, you need to come close. For this <kbd>16mm</kbd> shot I almost shoved the camera into the reeds. I was going for a bit darker muted color, so that part is actually intentional.
+File:nikon16-35_wide_boathouse.jpg|Another <kbd>16mm</kbd> shot. Such extreme [[wide angle]] will distort the picture quite a lot. There are a couple of things that allow me to sort of get away with some of the problems. There are a lot of curved surfaces (the thrash cans, the coast like, the roof), and I keep the structure in the center. With people all over the coast, this shot would not have worked as well.
 </gallery>