APS-C: Difference between revisions

From Antalya
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
<div class="jumbotron">
<div class="jumbotron">
==The smaller photo sensor==
==The smaller photo sensor==
Welcome to my pages on Photography. I am an [[Amateur photography|amateur photographer]] who likes [[technical aspects of photography]]. These pages are here to share my experience.  
This is known as the ''cheaper'' type of digital cameras. At about 25mm by 16mm the sensor is simply 1.5x smaller than a [[full frame]] sensor. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this.
</div>
</div>


Line 12: Line 12:
<div class="col-xs-12 col-md-8 col-lg-8">
<div class="col-xs-12 col-md-8 col-lg-8">
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel panel-default">
<div class="panel-heading">'''My first Nikon DSLR'''</div>
<div class="panel-heading">'''APS-C for cost-efficient solutions'''</div>
<div class="panel-body">
<div class="panel-body">
'''12 [[Megapixel]] [[APS-C]]'''<br>
Back in the [[analog]] days, Advanced Photo System (APS) was an attempt to introduce a new film standard. The type-C for classic was a 25mm x 16mm film, smaller than the regular 35mm film. It did not work well, as it was introduced too late just as [[digital]] photography was taking off.  
It was a complete coincidence that I ended up buying this camera. I was using smaller compact cameras and wanted to try my hand in something better. It came with a kit [[Nikon 18-105]] lens. I still use this camera, in fact a good portion of my pictures on the [https://twitter.com/pulp_platform PULP Platform twitter page] are made with it. The shutter count is over 60'000 (in more than 10 years), so that gives you some idea on how many pictures you end up making as an extremely trigger happy [[Amateur photography|amateur photographer]].


I loved this camera so much that I bought a second one [[New or used|used]] as part of preparing these pages. This second D90 is in great shape.
Manufacturing image sensors is a challenging process, without going into too much details, the larger you make the sensor the more likely it will have some defects. That is why, larger sensors are more expensive. It is actually a coincidence that 35mm film was just about the size that it was possible to manufacture an image sensor.
 
By making the sensor a bit smaller, it is possible to '''a)''' get more sensors per manufactured wafer and '''b)''' have a higher proportion of the manufactured sensors that are functional.
 
A smaller light sensitive area makes the job of the lens also easier, light has to be bundled to a smaller area, allowing lenses to be built that are smaller and lighter (and cheaper).  
</div>
</div>
</div><!-- End of pan -->
</div><!-- End of pan -->
</div><!-- end of col-->
</div><!-- end of col-->
</div><!-- end of row-->
</div><!-- end of row-->
=== But smaller sensor is not as good as a larger sensor, is it? ===
There is a lot that goes into the quality of the sensor. But everything else being equal, the sensitivity of an image sensor is basically proportional to the area of each [[Megapixel|picture element]]. The larger each [[Megapixel|picture element]] the more sensitive the sensor. The size of each [[Megapixel|picture element]] depends on the [[resolution]] of the sensor. A 12 [[Megapixel]] sensor (of the same type) has twice as large [[Megapixel|picture elements]] as a 24 [[Megapixel]] sensor, so each element is more sensitive, but the overall [[resolution]] is worse.
As [[full frame]] sensors are larger, for the same [[resolution]] they have [[Megapixel|picture elements]] that are about 1.5x larger, and they are therefore  more sensitive. Technically a 12 [[Megapixel]] APS-C camera could be more sensitive than a 24 [[Megapixel]] [[full frame]] camera. But the size of the [[Megapixel|picture element]] is not the only criteria. As they are sold for a higher price, [[full frame]] sensors are (sometimes) made using a better process and therefore are better even for the same [[Megapixel|picture element]] size. 
See a [[Most equipment is more than good enough|comparison for a practical example]], you will notice that for most practical purposes those differences do not really matter. APS-C [[digital]] [[cameras]] are excellent, do not let anyone fool you.
=== Further Reading ===
* [[Combine APS-C and full frame cameras]]
* [[Most equipment is more than good enough]]
=== APS-C equipment on this wiki===
====[[Cameras]]====
<DynamicPageList>
category = Cameras
category = APS-C
suppresserrors=true
mode=inline
</DynamicPageList>
====[[Lenses]]====
<DynamicPageList>
category = Lenses
category = APS-C
suppresserrors=true
mode=inline
</DynamicPageList>




[[Category:Cameras]]
[[Category:Cameras]]
{{Photodisclaimer}}
{{Photodisclaimer}}

Revision as of 21:17, 28 November 2020


The smaller photo sensor

This is known as the cheaper type of digital cameras. At about 25mm by 16mm the sensor is simply 1.5x smaller than a full frame sensor. There is absolutely nothing wrong with this.

APSc.jpg

APS-C for cost-efficient solutions

Back in the analog days, Advanced Photo System (APS) was an attempt to introduce a new film standard. The type-C for classic was a 25mm x 16mm film, smaller than the regular 35mm film. It did not work well, as it was introduced too late just as digital photography was taking off.

Manufacturing image sensors is a challenging process, without going into too much details, the larger you make the sensor the more likely it will have some defects. That is why, larger sensors are more expensive. It is actually a coincidence that 35mm film was just about the size that it was possible to manufacture an image sensor.

By making the sensor a bit smaller, it is possible to a) get more sensors per manufactured wafer and b) have a higher proportion of the manufactured sensors that are functional.

A smaller light sensitive area makes the job of the lens also easier, light has to be bundled to a smaller area, allowing lenses to be built that are smaller and lighter (and cheaper).

But smaller sensor is not as good as a larger sensor, is it?

There is a lot that goes into the quality of the sensor. But everything else being equal, the sensitivity of an image sensor is basically proportional to the area of each picture element. The larger each picture element the more sensitive the sensor. The size of each picture element depends on the resolution of the sensor. A 12 Megapixel sensor (of the same type) has twice as large picture elements as a 24 Megapixel sensor, so each element is more sensitive, but the overall resolution is worse.

As full frame sensors are larger, for the same resolution they have picture elements that are about 1.5x larger, and they are therefore more sensitive. Technically a 12 Megapixel APS-C camera could be more sensitive than a 24 Megapixel full frame camera. But the size of the picture element is not the only criteria. As they are sold for a higher price, full frame sensors are (sometimes) made using a better process and therefore are better even for the same picture element size.

See a comparison for a practical example, you will notice that for most practical purposes those differences do not really matter. APS-C digital cameras are excellent, do not let anyone fool you.

Further Reading

APS-C equipment on this wiki

Cameras

Nikon Z FC, Nikon D500, Nikon D7100, Nikon D90

Lenses



These pages are for Amateur Photographers and not really for seasoned photographers and professionals. I have no affiliation or commercial interest with any brand/make. I write from my own experience. I ended up using mainly Nikon, so I am more familiar with this brand than others. See price for notes on pricing as well as photography related links.