File: Nikon28-300 vs 18 200.jpg: Difference between revisions

From Antalya
Jump to: navigation, search
(Here are two great universal zooms compared side by side. On the left, we have a full frame camera with the Nikon 28-300 and on the right the Nikon 18-200 on an APS-C body. The lenses are essentially identical. However, the Nikon 18-200 is lighter and costs less (especially when buying used))
 
No edit summary
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Summary ==
== Summary ==
Here are two great [[universal zooms]] compared side by side. On the left, we have a [[full frame]] camera with the [[Nikon 28-300]] and on the right the [[Nikon 18-200]] on an [[APS-C]] body. The lenses are essentially identical. However, the [[Nikon 18-200]] is lighter and costs less (especially when buying [[used]])
Here are two great [[universal zoom]]s compared side by side. On the left, we have a [[full frame]] camera with the [[Nikon 28-300]] and on the right the [[Nikon 18-200]] on an [[APS-C]] body. The lenses are essentially identical. However, the [[Nikon 18-200]] is lighter and costs less (especially when buying [[used]])

Latest revision as of 22:40, 25 March 2021

Summary

Here are two great universal zooms compared side by side. On the left, we have a full frame camera with the Nikon 28-300 and on the right the Nikon 18-200 on an APS-C body. The lenses are essentially identical. However, the Nikon 18-200 is lighter and costs less (especially when buying used)

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current22:39, 25 March 2021Thumbnail for version as of 22:39, 25 March 20211,280 × 852 (628 KB)Kgf (talk | contribs)Here are two great universal zooms compared side by side. On the left, we have a full frame camera with the Nikon 28-300 and on the right the Nikon 18-200 on an APS-C body. The lenses are essentially identical. However, the Nikon 18-200 is lighter and costs less (especially when buying used)

The following page uses this file:

Metadata